After that we decided to make a basic storyboard, just with stick figure drawings, which also gave a sense of what we wanted on screen. We also managed to sort out a few problems with framing before we even started filming which was very helpful. As for techniques, we were required to primarily consider continuity. This meant using the 180 degree rule and 30 degree rule as well as match on action and shot reverse shots. While writing it we considered Levi-Strauss' theory of creating narrative through binary opposites like good verses evil. The opposites we had were:
-Big vs. Small
-Friends vs. Friendless
-Tall/confident vs. hunched and scared
-Loud vs. Quiet
- Time:
We were given an hour to plan, an hour to shoot and another hour to edit. This meant getting our heads down and keeping work flow at a constant. During the planning we made sure we were clear on all shot ideas so that we could shoot them with relative ease when the time came. We also had to make sure it wasn't too complicated in order to get it done in time.
- Number of people:
Unfortunately our group only had 3 people. This meant that we could only have 2 people acting at a time and make sure the transition between different camera men was both smooth during the shooting and didn't show up during the edit. Our idea was easy enough to do with 3 people and we all pitched in during shooting; directing and giving ideas, which really helped keep the project moving
- Continuity:
This was perhaps the most important factor as it was the point of the task. When shooting, we had to make sure that everything in the scene remained unchanged which was achieved simply by keeping the room free and setting up in advance. We had to keep the lighting the same so we used the non natural lights present in the room. We had to follow continuity rules, such as the 180 degree line rule, the 30 degree rule, and the shot reverse shot technique. We also included a technique called eyeline matching which kept the actors at a level with the audience.
- Location:
We were only able to shoot in school, and so we were limited to where we could actually go. Many rooms were in use at the time of our shooting and so we used the most sensible room (the room our lesson was in).
The success of our sequence was quite high. The match on action shots were very effective, especially on the grabbing of the door handle and chair. The 180 rule was adhered to and the continuity of the sequence was spot on (which was the point of this exercise)
The last few shots were highly effective in portraying the desired emotion of fear and the speed of the action.
There were however a few problems with the sequence. The arc of the camera was slightly wobbly and the framing off as the bully walked over to sit down by the nerd. This was probably due to the tripod being left on too stiff controls. One major issue is the use of the POV shot when the bully stands. This POV shot is supposed to be from the view of the nerd, however just before that shot the nerd is looking another way so the shot doesn't make sense. In hindsight I would have liked to start that shot with a pan across to the bully to represent the nerds head turning.
I think the sequence on the whole was very successful in portraying what we wanted and what I've learnt will be useful in later projects.
Looking back I think more detailed storyboarding and a wider variety of shots will allow the editing process to be much smoother. Also the time limit was a big constraint so in future projects I will make sure I have plenty of extra time on my hands.